![]() ![]() ![]() Converse, Survey Research in the United States: Roots and Emergence, 1890–1960 (Berkeley, CA, 1987), 87–127. 1 (2006): 204–13 and, in the same volume, Michael Schudson, “The Troubling Equivalence of Citizen and Consumer,” 194–206. See also Lawrence Glickman, “The Consumer and the Citizen in Personal Influence,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 608, no. Lizbeth Cohen, A Consumer’s Republic: The Politics of Mass Consumption in Postwar America (New York, 2003). 1 (1983): 39–45.Ĭharles Trappey “A Meta-Analysis of Consumer Choice and Subliminal Advertising,” Psychology and Marketing 13, no. Joseph Lamp, “Public Perceptions of Subliminal Advertising, Journal of Advertising 12, no. For further discussion, see Brannon and Brock, “The Subliminal Persuasion Controversy.”Įric J. ![]() Wilson Brian Key, The Age of Manipulation: The Con in Confidence, the Sin in Sincere (New York, 1989), xviii. Laura Brannon and Timothy Brock, “The Subliminal Persuasion Controversy: Reality, Enduring Fable, and Polonius’s Weasel,” in Persuasion: Psychological Insights and Perspectives, ed. Broyles, “Subliminal Advertising and the Perpetual Popularity of Playing to People’s Paranoia,” Journal of Consumer Affairs 40, vol. Danzig, “Subliminal Advertising-Today It’s Just Historical Flashback for Researcher Vicary,” Advertising Age, September 17, 1962. Stuart Rogers, “How a Publicity Blitz Created the Myth of Subliminal Advertising,” Public Relations Quarterly 37, no. Pratkanis “The Cargo-Cult Science of Subliminal Persuasion,” Skeptical Inquirer 16, no. See also Bertrand Klass, “The Ghost of Subliminal Advertising,” Journal of Marketing 23, no. He, too, finds that the most effective examples are closest to consciousness and involve behaviors that subjects are already predisposed to. 3 (1994): 271–90.įor a recent study, see Rajeev Kohi, “An Experimental Investigation into the Effect of Subliminal Stimulation on Consumer Behavior” (PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania, 1985). Theus, “Subliminal Advertising and the Psychology of Processing Unconscious Stimuli: A Review of Research,” Psychology & Marketing 11, no. Klein, “Conscious Effects of Prolonged Subliminal Exposures of Words,” American Psychologist 12 (July 1957): 397.įor more, see Richard Lazarus and Robert McCleary, “Autonomic Discrimination without Awareness: A Study in Subception,” Psychological Review 58 (March 1951): 113–22.Īdvertising Research Foundation, The Application of Subliminal Perception in Advertising (New York, 1958). McNeil “Subliminal Stimulation: An Overview,” The American Psychologist 13, no. Moore, “Subliminal Advertising: What You See is What You Get” also James V. ![]() Ralph Norman Haber, “Public Attitudes Regarding Subliminal Advertising,” The Public Opinion Quarterly 23, no. Israel Goldiamond, “The Hysteria over Subliminal Advertising as Misunderstanding of Science,” American Psychologist 14, no. Norman Cousins, “Smudging the Subconscious,” Saturday Review 40 (1957): 1. Moore, “Subliminal Advertising: What You See is What You Get,” Journal of Marketing 46, no. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. 1 Subliminal advertising, a term not found in the Reader’s Guide to Periodical Literature before 1957, rivaled reports of UFOs and communist spies for the top story of the year. In little more than a year, Vicary predicted, cinemas across the nation would be using this new, unorthodox selling technique. When Vicary revealed the test to the public a few days later, he bragged that his hidden messages had induced a surge in popcorn and soft drink sales of 50 and 18 percent, respectively. As patrons watched Kim Novak and William Holden cavorting in the film Picnic, the words “eat popcorn” and “drink Coca Cola” infiltrated their subconscious. James Vicary, a forty-two-year-old marketing consultant, convinced the theater owners to flicker images across the screen at one-three-thousandth of a second, faster than the eye could see. On September 12, 1957, audiences at a Fort Lee, New Jersey, drive-in movie theater became the unwitting subjects of a psychological experiment. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |